One loading cell limits the line
Use timestamped production data to confirm loading—not upstream accumulation or case closure—is the actual constraint.
Configure two coordinated loading positions around your actual product flow, case pattern and accepted output. The useful proposal is not a headline speed: it is a documented loading concept, interface plan and FAT acceptance basis.
It is an automatic case packing machine with two coordinated loading positions or work cells. The stations can interleave product collation, case presentation and loading so one part of the system is productive while another completes its sequence.
Use timestamped production data to confirm loading—not upstream accumulation or case closure—is the actual constraint.
Separate cells can support longer pick, orientation or placement sequences when drop loading or side pushing is unsuitable.
Define accumulation, restart logic and product ownership so two stations do not create duplicated, missing or mixed cases.
Start with the case packing machine range, then compare a side-push case packer and an opening-loading-sealing system.
The final sequence depends on whether case erection and closure are integrated or supplied as separate machines. A typical project still needs these six controlled functions.
Accept a stable, counted flow from the cartoner, bundler, filler or conveyor without losing product identity.
Form the agreed row, layer or group while controlling orientation, spacing and buffer limits.
Deliver an erected case at the defined datum; verify presence, opening and readiness before loading.
Coordinate the two cells so product ownership, gripper travel and safe-zone logic remain unambiguous.
Transfer the loaded case to the contracted tape, hot-melt or other closure process and confirm completion.
Reconcile product and case counts, route rejects and release accepted cases to conveying or palletizing.
For a complete end-of-line project, define the interface with the upstream cartoning machine and the broader turnkey packaging line.
Do not convert a manipulator cycle rate directly into sellable cases. Calculate every limiting step, then apply the agreed acceptance and availability basis.
Good cases/min = min(product supply, collation, loading, closure, discharge) × acceptance rate
Also define the loading pattern, products per case, simultaneous picks, recovery time and whether brief stops are included in the test result.
| Quotation field | Your requirement | Supplier must state |
|---|---|---|
| Accepted output | Good cases/minute and shift demand | Guaranteed rate, test product, test case and calculation basis |
| Product | Dimensions, weight, surface, fragility and orientation | Collation method, gripper design and sample-test result |
| Case | Internal/external size, board, joint, opening and closure | Case presentation method and approved tolerance window |
| Pack pattern | Rows, columns, layers, dividers and orientation | Sequence drawing, products per pick and products per case |
| Utilities | Destination voltage and plant air standard | Connected load, operating consumption, pressure and air quality |
| Footprint | Available line space and access route | GA drawing, maintenance clearance and operator positions |
| Controls | Upstream/downstream signals and records | I/O list, buffer logic, recipes, alarms and data handoff |
| Safety | Site standard and risk assessment expectations | Guarding, interlocks, safe zones and recovery procedure |
| Evidence | FAT, drawings, manuals, training and qualification support | Named deliverables, language, revision and acceptance date |
Suitability must be proven with representative product and case samples. The table below is a selection framework, not a universal capability claim.
| Product behavior | Loading question | Evidence to request |
|---|---|---|
| Rigid bottles, jars or cans | Can the gripper control neck, body or grouped packs without marking? | Pick test, retention check and placement repeatability |
| Cartoned blisters or small boxes | Can products be collated without scuffing, telescoping or mixed orientation? | Pattern trial, count reconciliation and jam challenge |
| Pouches and flexible packs | How are shape variation, trapped air and sealing edges controlled? | Sample trial across the approved fill-weight range |
| Fragile or premium packs | What acceleration, contact pressure and drop distance are allowed? | Damage criteria, retained samples and high/low speed trials |
| Mixed formats | Which components change, and how is the correct recipe verified? | Changeover demonstration and wrong-format challenge |


The final quotation must identify every included module, interface and performance commitment. A generic model table does not replace the project technical agreement.
Integrated erection, erected-case infeed or manual presentation; magazine capacity and low-level response.
Lane count, accumulation, grouping, orientation, separators and product ownership between stations.
Vacuum, clamp, tray, pusher or custom end effector selected from actual product trials.
Tape, hot melt or transfer to a separate sealer, with closure inspection and consumable alarms.
Product count, case presence, load verification, closure check, reject confirmation and reconciliation.
Line handshakes, recipe access, alarm history, coding, aggregation and production-record interfaces.
If loading is already defined, compare an automatic case sealing machine and a four-corner sealing machine.
All SKU dimensions, weights, surfaces, orientation, fragility and representative samples.
Drawings, samples, board construction, closure style, usable internal size and tolerance.
Products per case, rows, layers, dividers, orientation and presentation requirements.
Good cases/minute, batch and shift demand, planned efficiency and growth allowance.
Upstream rate, buffer, downstream conveyor, coding, inspection and data requirements.
Drawings, manuals, FAT, training, spare parts, qualification support and site services.
A second loading station only creates value when product ownership and line recovery are engineered clearly. Before approving a quotation, ask the supplier to show what each station owns during normal running, starvation, blockage and restart.
The acceptance test should prove good-case output with your real pack pattern and record every rejected or reworked case—not just show that two manipulators can move.
It is an automatic case packing system with two coordinated loading positions or work cells. The cells can interleave product grouping, case presentation and loading, but the final architecture depends on the product, case pattern, closure method and line interface.
No. Accepted output is limited by the slowest confirmed stage, including upstream product release, collation, gripper travel, case presentation, closure and discharge. The quotation should guarantee good cases per minute for the nominated product and case.
Calculate the confirmed rate of product supply, collation, loading, closure and discharge, use the lowest value, then apply the agreed acceptance or availability basis. State products per case, products per pick and the test run duration.
Potential applications include rigid containers, cartoned products, blister packs, pouches and other grouped products. Capability must be proven with representative samples because surface, weight, fragility, orientation and pack variation determine the collation and gripper design.
Provide internal and external dimensions, board and flute, manufacturer joint, opening direction, closure method, tolerances, samples, loaded weight, loading pattern and any dividers or inserts.
It can be engineered as an integrated line when the upstream release signal, buffer limits, case-packer acceptance, discharge conveyor and downstream handshake are defined in one interface document and proven during FAT.
Test the target good-case rate, count reconciliation, loading quality, closure, missing and doubled products, case faults, starvation, blockage, stop and restart, format change and station recovery with the approved product and cases.
Send the product set, case drawings and samples, loading pattern, accepted output, line-interface requirements, utilities, floor plan, documentation requirements and the requested FAT evidence.
Send the inputs below. HIJ can return a project-specific loading concept, interface scope, performance basis and FAT plan instead of an unsupported generic speed claim.