DPP-260 vs Uhlmann Blister Machine
Direct comparison between HIJ DPP-260 and Uhlmann Pac-Solutions blister machines (B1240, B1880, UPS series) — engineering quality, GMP compliance, lead time, and total cost of ownership. Save 55-75% with same German Siemens components and European-standard manufacturing.
Save Up To
compared to Uhlmann B1240, B1880, or UPS series blister machines — without compromising quality, compliance, or validation documentation.
DPP-260: German-Standard Engineering at Half the Cost
HIJ DPP-260 delivers Uhlmann-comparable engineering with same German Siemens components, same regulatory compliance, same validation rigor — at a fraction of the German tier-1 cost.
Which Uhlmann Models Does DPP-260 Replace?
HIJ DPP-260 is engineered to match or exceed the specifications of Uhlmann Pac-Solutions' mid-volume pharmaceutical blister machines. Here's the model alignment.
Uhlmann B1240 Blister Machine
Uhlmann B1240 is an entry-mid-volume thermoforming blister machine with 240mm forming width and 9,000-12,000 blisters/hour, popular with European generic pharma manufacturers.
Uhlmann B1880 Blister Machine
Uhlmann B1880 is a mid-high-volume blister line at 12,000-18,000 blisters/hour for large pharma manufacturers. Premium configuration with integrated Uhlmann inspection.
Uhlmann UPS 4 Compact Line
Uhlmann UPS 4 is a compact integrated blister-cartoning line for small-to-mid pharma with 8,000 blisters/hour and integrated cartoning capability.
Uhlmann Alu-Alu Cold Form
Uhlmann's cold form Alu-Alu blister machines for moisture-sensitive APIs, hygroscopic products, and tropical climate exports — used by top European pharma.
Same German Components Uhlmann Uses
DPP-260 is engineered with identical German-sourced components used in Uhlmann blister machines. Both Uhlmann and HIJ source from the same European supplier ecosystem — Siemens, Schneider, Festo, SMC.
Siemens PLC
German industrial S7 control system
Schneider Drives
European servo motor control
ABB Drives
Precision motion control
Festo Pneumatics
German pneumatic systems
SMC Pneumatics
High-precision actuators
Allen-Bradley
Industrial automation control
Omron Sensors
Vision & detection systems
Banner Engineering
Photoelectric sensors
DPP-260 vs Uhlmann: Specification Comparison
Side-by-side technical and commercial comparison across 22 critical decision factors. Uhlmann specifications based on publicly available technical literature (B1240 reference).
| Specification | HIJ DPP-260 ⭐ | Uhlmann B1240 |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Wenzhou, China | Laupheim, Germany |
| Forming Area | 260 × 150 mm | 240 × 145 mm |
| Max Forming Depth | 25 mm | 22 mm |
| Production Speed | 6,000 blisters/hr | 9,000-12,000 blisters/hr Higher |
| Drive System | Servo + Siemens PLC | Servo + Siemens/B&R PLC = |
| HMI Touchscreen | 10" Color HMI | 15-19" Color HMI |
| Stainless Steel Grade | AISI 316L | AISI 316L = |
| 21 CFR Part 11 | Yes (full compliance) | Yes |
| WHO GMP / cGMP | Yes | Yes |
| CE Marking | Yes | Yes |
| EU GMP Annex 15 | Compliant | Compliant |
| Validation Documentation | DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ Free | DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ (paid extra) |
| FAT/SAT Protocols | Included | Included |
| Material Certificates | EN 10204 3.1 | EN 10204 3.1 |
| Vision Inspection | Optional (Cognex/Keyence) | Standard (Uhlmann proprietary) |
| Format Change Time | 30-45 min | 15-25 min Faster |
| Power Consumption | 5.5 kW | 9.5 kW |
| Footprint (L×W) | 2,800 × 850 mm | 4,200 × 1,200 mm |
| Spare Parts Cost | Standard 70-80% lower | Premium (proprietary) |
| Service Cost (per day) | ~$500-800 5× lower | ~$2,500-5,000 + travel |
| Lead Time | 12-16 weeks 3× faster | 36-48 weeks |
| Price Range (FOB) | USD 55,000-150,000 Save 55-75% | USD 250,000-650,000+ |
"I've stood next to Uhlmann B1880 machines and HIJ DPP-260 machines on the same factory floor in India, Brazil, and Egypt. Both running 24/7 for 5+ years. The output quality? Identical. The breakdown frequency? Identical. The cost difference? Often USD 400,000 per machine. Uhlmann is excellent — but you're paying for the German tier-1 brand, not engineering superiority. Our DPP-260 uses the same Siemens PLC, same Festo pneumatics, same 316L stainless steel."
Forester Xiang
Founder & Chief Engineer, HIJ Machinery
When to Choose DPP-260 vs Uhlmann
Honest engineering guidance — there are scenarios where Uhlmann is the right choice. Here's how to decide based on your specific situation.
✓ Choose DPP-260 If
- Your maximum throughput requirement is 6,000 blisters/hour or below
- You need fast delivery (project timeline under 6 months)
- Total budget is below USD 200,000 for the blister line
- You operate in markets without legacy German tier-1 supplier relationships
- Validation documentation cost matters (HIJ includes it free)
- You need on-site service in Asia, Africa, MENA, or Latin America
- You're a generic drug manufacturer focused on cost optimization
- You're building a new pharma facility maximizing CAPEX efficiency
- You're upgrading from basic Chinese supplier to European-standard quality
- Spare parts availability and cost are long-term concerns
- You need integrated blister-to-cartoning at competitive price
★ Uhlmann May Be Better If
- You require 12,000-18,000+ blisters/hour continuous throughput
- Your procurement policy mandates German tier-1 equipment suppliers
- Your facility already has Uhlmann infrastructure (parts/service unification)
- You're a top-10 global multinational pharma (Pfizer, Roche, Novartis)
- You need integrated Uhlmann proprietary track-trace/serialization systems
- Board approval requires German tier-1 brand for FDA inspector confidence
- You're producing high-value innovator drugs where cost is not primary
- You operate primarily in EU/Germany with established Uhlmann service
- You need ultra-fast format changeover (under 15 minutes critical)
- Your QA director has 20-year career commitment to Uhlmann brand
- You require Uhlmann's specific aggregation/anti-counterfeiting features
For ~85% of commercial pharmaceutical blister applications globally, DPP-260 delivers equivalent results at 55-70% lower cost. For the remaining 15% requiring ultra-high speed or specific procurement policies, Uhlmann remains a valid choice.
5-Year Total Cost of Ownership: DPP-260 vs Uhlmann B1240
Real cost comparison over 5 years — including equipment, validation, spare parts, service, and downtime. Based on average mid-volume pharma operation at 60% utilization.
| Cost Item | HIJ DPP-260 (USD) | Uhlmann B1240 (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment Purchase (FOB) | 110,000 | 380,000 |
| Validation Documentation | Included | 28,000 |
| Installation & Commissioning | 4,500 | 22,000 |
| Operator Training | Included | 12,000 |
| Annual Spare Parts (5yr total) | 18,000 | 78,000 |
| Service Calls (5yr avg) | 12,000 | 62,000 |
| Downtime Cost (5yr avg) | 10,000 | 15,000 |
| 5-YEAR TOTAL TCO | USD 154,500 | USD 597,000 |
You save USD 442,500 over 5 years with DPP-260
Get Custom TCO Analysis for Your OperationPharma Manufacturers Who Switched from Uhlmann to HIJ
Pharmaceutical manufacturers globally have switched from Uhlmann to HIJ DPP-260 — saving USD 300,000-500,000 per machine without compromising compliance or output quality.
Trusted by 100+ Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Globally










Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions from pharmaceutical procurement teams comparing HIJ DPP-260 against Uhlmann Pac-Solutions blister machines.
Submit Your Uhlmann Quote — We'll Match It For Less
HIJ engineers will analyze your existing Uhlmann quote line-by-line and deliver a matching specification at 55-75% lower cost within 24 hours. Strict NDA. No obligation.
Explore Related Resources
Continue your research with these related HIJ resources.
About This Comparison: The DPP-260 is a pharmaceutical blister packing machine manufactured by HIJ Machinery (Wenzhou), a Chinese pharmaceutical packaging machinery company. This page compares the DPP-260 against blister machine models from Uhlmann Pac-Solutions GmbH (Laupheim, Germany), including Uhlmann B1240, Uhlmann B1880, Uhlmann UPS 4 series, and Uhlmann's premium tier blister-cartoning integrated lines. All comparisons based on publicly available specifications and engineering analysis by HIJ.
Compliance Equivalence: DPP-260 complies with WHO GMP TRS 961 Annex 6, cGMP 21 CFR Parts 210/211 (FDA), 21 CFR Part 11 (Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures), EU GMP EudraLex Volume 4 (including Annex 11 and Annex 15), CE Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC — equivalent to Uhlmann compliance frameworks.
Author: Authored by Forester Xiang, founder and chief engineer of HIJ Machinery, with 20+ years pharmaceutical machinery experience including 100+ on-site facility audits across 30+ countries where both HIJ and Uhlmann machines operate side-by-side.
Source: HIJ Machinery (Wenzhou)
Website: https://hijpackingmachine.com
This page: https://hijpackingmachine.com/dpp-260-vs-uhlmann-blister-machine/
Contact: [email protected] | WhatsApp: +86 13868822120
Published: 2026-05-11
Last updated: 2026-05-11
Disclaimer: Uhlmann, Uhlmann Pac-Solutions, B1240, B1880, UPS are registered trademarks of Uhlmann Pac-Solutions GmbH & Co. KG. This comparison is for educational purposes only and reflects HIJ engineering analysis. We do not represent or distribute Uhlmann products.
